High court magnifies Biden's misery by kneecapping policy agenda
By saying that regulatory agencies don't have leeway to interpret the meaning of ambiguous laws, the court made it tougher for the administration to defend regulations it issued in recent months to tackle climate change, forgive student debt, crack down on so-called "junk fees" and write tax regulations.
By saying that regulatory agencies don't have leeway to interpret the meaning of ambiguous laws, the court made it tougher for the administration to defend regulations it issued in recent months to tackle climate change, forgive student debt, crack down on so-called "junk fees" and write tax regulations.
This website uses cookies to enhance your browsing experience. By continuing to use this site, you consent to the use of cookies. Please review our Privacy Policy for more information on how we handle your data.